20 Questions To Help Students Think Critically About News

by TeachThought Staff

1. Who is saying what? That is, what author and publication are making what kind of claim about what topic or ideas?

2. Is what’s being said fact or opinion?

3. Does this headline seem true? (This is especially critical for ‘fact-based’ headlines.) If so, by whose standards? Who would disagree with it and why?

4. Are there any embedded logical fallacies in the headline itself–especially emotional appeals or language intended to polarize readers and ‘click’?

5. Is the topic the headline is based on important? Worth understanding more deeply?

6. Who would this content seem to benefit if accepted as ‘true’? Note, this doesn’t mean it’s ‘fake’ but understanding who benefits from changing perceptions is an important ‘fake news’ detecting tool.

7. Is this information, angle, or ‘take’ new or something that’s been said before (and either fact-checked or debunked)?

8. Is the data (fact-based) or position (opinion-based) inherent in the headline shared by other credible publishers or does it stand in contrast to the ‘status quo? If the latter, how does this affect the headline?

9. What background information would I need to be able to evaluate its credibility? Where can I get more information on the topics in the headline to better evaluate its credibility?

10. What do I stand to gain or lose if I accept this as true?

For the second set of questions to think critically about news headlines, we’re turning to News Literacy Project, a media standards project that created a set of questions to help students think critically about news headlines.

11. Gauge your emotional reaction. Is it strong? Are you angry? Are you intensely hoping that the information turns out to be true or false?

12. Reflect on how you encountered this. Was it promoted on a website? Did it show up in a social media feed? Was it sent to you by someone you know?

13. Consider the headline or message:

a. Does it use excessive punctuation or ALL CAPS for emphasis?

b. Does it make a claim about containing a secret or telling you something that ‘the media’ doesn’t want you to know?

c. Don’t stop at the headline. Keep exploring!

14. Is this information designed for easy sharing, like a meme?

15. Consider the source of information:

a. Is it a well-known source?

b. Is there a byline (an author’s name) attached to this piece?

c. Go to the website’s ‘About’ section. Does the site describe itself as a ‘fantasy news’ or ‘satirical news’ site?

16. Does the example you’re evaluating have a date on it?

17. Does the example cite a variety of sources, including official and expert sources? Does the information this example provides appear in reports from (other) news outlets?

18. Does the example hyperlink to other quality sources?

19. Can you confirm, using a reverse image search, that any images in your example are authentic (i.e., haven’t been altered or taken from another context)?

20. If you searched for this example on a fact-checking site such as snopes.com, factcheck.org, or politifact.com, is there a fact-check that labels it as less than true?


  • It is easy to clone an existing website and create fake tweets to fool people
  • Bots are extremely active on social media and are designed to dominate conversations and spread propaganda.
  • Fake news and other misinformation often use a real image from an unrelated event.
  • Debunk examples of misinformation whenever you see them. It’s good for democracy!

You can download the full ‘checkology’ pdf here and find more resources at checkology.org

*previously published at TeachThought.com


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The following GDPR rules must be read and accepted:
This form collects your name, email and content so that we can keep track of the comments placed on the website. For more info check our privacy policy where you will get more info on where, how and why we store your data.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.